
Real talk: the AirPods Pro 2 are still really good. So whether upgrading to AirPods Pro 3 makes sense depends on your specific situation.
Heart rate tracking - If you exercise without an Apple Watch, this is legitimately useful. The accuracy has impressed even skeptical reviewers.
Noise cancellation - Apple says 2x better, and testing backs it up. You'll really notice it on planes and trains.
Battery life - 8 hours vs 6 hours per charge. That extra 2 hours adds up over a workday.
Water resistance - IP57 vs IP54. Translation: you can actually sweat in these without worrying.
Hearing features - If you've been turning up the TV volume or asking people to repeat themselves, these could help.
Sound quality - Honestly, both sound great. You're not going to have an "oh wow" moment switching.
Case battery - It's actually worse. 24 hours vs 30 hours. Not a big deal for most people, but worth knowing.
That's a significant difference for features most people won't use daily.
Upgrade if...
Keep your Pro 2 if...
The Pro 2 at sale prices is genuinely one of the best earbud values out there. The Pro 3 is better, but not $80 better for everyone.
Here's our "TLDR" Review
Download ShopSavvy AppCompare prices for anything in real-time, set price alerts, watch for deals by keyword, and much more
Install ShopSavvy Browser ExtensionCompare and track prices automatically while you shop online at thousands of websites.
If you're still curious about the AirPods Pro 3, here are some other answers you might find interesting:
Short answer: Water-resistant, not waterproof. Big difference.
The AirPods Pro 3 are rated IP57. Here's the translation:
This is better than the Pro 2's IP54 rating, where the "4" only meant "splash resistant."
You're fine with:
Don't do this:
If you're doing Ironmans or swimming laps, these aren't the right choice. Look for IP68-rated earbuds specifically designed for water sports.
For everyone else doing normal gym stuff? The AirPods Pro 3 can handle it. Just don't be stupid about it.
Let me give you the honest breakdown on how the AirPods Pro 3 actually sound compared to the Pro 2.
The Pro 3 sound a bit better - more bass, wider stereo image, more "spacious." But it's not a night-and-day difference. If you close your eyes, you might not immediately know which is which.
More bass. Apple redesigned the acoustic chamber and it shows. Bass hits harder, especially noticeable on hip-hop and electronic music.
Wider soundstage. Music feels a bit more spread out, less "in your head." Spatial Audio content benefits from this too.
Better detail. You might notice more texture in reverb and room sounds. Subtle, but there.
Apple uses something called Loudness-Dependent EQ. Translation: the sound profile changes based on how loud you're listening.
At low volumes, they boost bass and treble. If you're a low-volume listener (like listening while falling asleep), you might actually find the Pro 3 sound weird at first - too bass-heavy compared to what you're used to.
No EQ controls. In 2025. On $249 earbuds. Seriously, Apple?
Some $30 earbuds let you adjust bass and treble. AirPods? Nope. You get what Apple decided you should hear.
No high-res audio. Still stuck on AAC. No LDAC, no aptX HD, nothing fancy. Your lossless Apple Music files aren't actually playing losslessly on these.
You'll probably notice the difference if:
You probably won't notice if:
Better? Yes. Worth upgrading just for sound? Probably not. The improvements are real but subtle. The AirPods Pro 2 sound excellent, and the Pro 3 sound... also excellent, just slightly more so.
Live Translation is one of those features that sounds incredible in Apple's keynote but has some real limitations in practice. Let me break down what it actually does and whether it's useful.
Someone speaks to you in Spanish (or another supported language), and you hear it in English through your AirPods Pro 3. When you reply in English, your phone translates it to Spanish and plays it through the speaker for them.
Pretty sci-fi, right?
Older phones can't do this even with the AirPods Pro 3.
Coming eventually: Italian, Japanese, Korean, Chinese
Notably missing: Mandarin and Hindi. You know, just two of the most spoken languages on Earth.
Here's what the reviews actually say:
It's useful for:
It's not great for:
Apple even puts a warning on it: translations "may be inaccurate, unexpected, or offensive." So, you know, maybe don't use it for important negotiations.
If you travel occasionally and just need basic help communicating, this is a cool bonus feature. If you were hoping this would replace learning a language or hiring a translator for serious situations... not quite there yet.
Think of it as a smarter version of holding up your phone to Google Translate, not as a universal translator from Star Trek.
Loading trending deals...
Get the latest news, and updates on ShopSavvy. You'll be glad you did!